Good September morn you war-torn, hardcore camera geeks! Continuing on from our last article, here is Part Two of my YouTube series on “The Lonely Art” of film developing.
This video focuses on the “fixing” part of bw film development. It is a very important process that makes your images permanent and protects the film from going bad, ie, fogging up, etc.
Incidentally, the fixer is also the part of bw film developing that “smells” the most! All the fixers I have used have had this really pungent, sour smell to them.
Some of you may remember the Flickr group with the brilliant name of “Film Is Not Dead It Just Smells Funny.” Personally, I believe the fixer is what they’re talking about. If I am wrong, let me know!
Anyway, this video is a little more technical than the last but my main point is still NOT about teaching bw film developing. Many people already have videos up that show you how to do it way better than I can.
What I have learned over the years is that, even though there are guidelines as to what to do for whatever film or developer you’re using, there can be variations and people sometimes do things a little differently but as long as you don’t stray too far from the formula, your results should be ok.
The point of this video is to show how tedious the process can be. There’s a lot of downtime involved, a lot of counting minutes. It reminds me a lot of when I worked overnight security for a big tech company. I did in the 1990s so I could go to school during the day.
There was a lot of downtime, free time with that job. Often I would read books, eat, call friends, exercise or get lost in thought. Anything to past the time. And the same goes for developing film.
When I started relearning the process over a decade ago, it was fun, fascinating and I did a lot of it. Today, I still find the results fascinating but I don’t quite enjoy the process as much. My mind wanders.
And even though it doesn’t take all that long to do one roll of film, it feels like forever sometimes but no it’s not. Actually yes, when you factor the scanning and processing thereafter, it does feel like forever!
In the video, I exaggerate some of the things I might do while waiting but there’s a lot of truth to those exaggerations. It is a deeply personal process. Some people put music on, some might do their bills, meditate, etc. It takes a patient person to want to develop film but the results, especially when good, are most worthwhile.
Also to keep it fun, I reveal in this video a camera I’ve been shooting with a lot the past couple of months. Can you guess what it is? 🙂
Thanks for watching and feel free to leave a comment about your experiences, I love to hear from you!
Good day you hardcore camera geeks! Well, as you may or may not know, this summer I am concentrating on building our YouTube channel. As a result the written blog is suffering a little, but I have faith it will catch up. The content already written will always be there so I’m not too worried about it.
Today’s YouTube video focuses on “Lonely Art” of developing film, and in particular black and white film.
At home film developing has always been a labor of love for me although in recent years the stress is on the word labor more than love.
I had my first experience developing film in high school. I think we’re going back to 1986 or 1987! Anyway, as a young kid with no patience I think I was traumatized by my early failed efforts and I didn’t develop film again for many decades.
Besides, in the 1990s and early 2000s I focused more on color film which was easy to have developed at any “One Hour Photo.” Ironically, it’s harder to get your film developed today than it was then! I mean, yes, CVS or Walgreens will develop your film. They send it out actually. But you will NOT get your negatives back.
What you will get are either prints and/or a photo cd. This is the digital age and we actually live in an age where people print less. And I admit I’m guilty of viewing most of my photos these days on any number of devices, ie, computer, phone, tablet.
Anyway, when I reignited my love for b&w photography, I learned how to develop b&w film at home and I’ve been doing it now for about 11 years I’d say.
I’m no expert at it. And I don’t always follow the instructions to a tee but for the most part whatever I’ve been doing has worked for me.
Black and white film development basically involves three steps: Film developer, stop bath, and fixer. Agitation is what you do within these steps. Oh yeah, there’s a final rinse, and Photo Flo, etc, but it’s not as complicated as it sounds. Scanning is the after process. Your images actually become a hybrid digital/film thing.
Anyway, this video is NOT about how to develop film. And my film developing methods may be very different from yours. I learned a very imprecise method from an old pro. It’s may not be textbook but it worked for him and it works for me. I may make a video on that later but this video is about the “Lonely Art” of film developing.
I usually develop my film in lonely hours, well after midnight. By then it’s very dark and I don’t have to worry about damage to the film from the light or worry about anyone disrupting my workflow.
This video is about the solitary nature of developing film at home and all the downtime you have when developing film. And with that downtime, many things enter your mind. Thoughts and memories locked within the inner reaches of your brain are released. That is what this video series is about.
What do YOU do when you develop your film? Do you play music? Do you calculate your bills and expenses? Do you clean the bathroom tub? I’d love to know how you spend the time! Feel free to leave a comment.
Have a great day you great camera people and many thanks for watching and for your kind support!
Yesterday was the Fourth of July and America celebrated its 244th birthday. With the Coronavirus once again wreaking havoc in much of the USA and social unrest gripping the nation, America’s birthday this year is very different from any other year in recent memory. Some say it might be the worst year ever. It may be a traumatic, tumultuous year but certainly not a boring year to say the least!
One thing that hasn’t changed is that every 4th of July, on a purely photo related level, I reflect on the cameras that I feel are true American Camera Legends and that’s what I’m doing today.
Past contenders were the Argus C3 and the Kodak Medalist. This year, it’s the Polaroid SX-70. I have used the SX-70 for many years, but have never really reviewed it though perhaps I should, but today is not that today. I have always kind of viewed it as a “personal project” camera.
I love shooting the SX-70 and I’d love to shoot it more often but the price of the film has always meant that it would never be my main shooter. I mean, for $18.99 you get 8 shots. That means you got to make every shot count! And sometimes I don’t or can’t.
Now in the past, especially in the early days of the Impossible Project’s attempts at keeping Polaroid film alive, I didn’t think the film was ready for prime time. It was very inconsistent with bad color shifts, uneven spots, scratches, etc. Needless to say I had many wasted shots which kind of killed my enthusiasm.
I understood even back then that they were attempting to do something that really seemed “Impossible” so I did not expect perfection right away. I’ve always admired their efforts as a great and noble project to salvage one of photography’s great treasures. I just didn’t want to throw good money out but I supported the project whenever I could by buying stuff from them.
Flash forward to today, and I’m pleased to say the SX-70 film that Polaroid (formerly Polaroid Originals, formerly the Impossible Project) have been putting out for the past few years is much better! Rich, colorful and sharp, and everything is more consistent. I feel that the color is shifted more to the blue or “cool” spectrum but that’s just an observation not a complaint.
Today, I just want to celebrate Dr. Edwin Land’s creation with a photo I took yesterday on the Fourth of July. The SX-70 was introduced in 1972 and to me it remains one of the greatest photographic machines ever made. The beauty of a sharply focused SX-70 print is something to behold.
Just one more shoutout to the makers of the current Polaroid film. Making quality instant film is a fine art and these folks have truly done the impossible in not only keeping SX-70 film (and consequently, the SX-70 itself) alive but also to continue to improve it to the point where I think it’s nearly as good as the original Polaroid formula. Well done guys!
Now I’m just hoping their pack film project goes just as well. It will take time, maybe even years, but I’m convinced they can do it!
Quick Covid-19 Update: I’m sorry I continue to be away for lengthy periods. This is my new norm friends. I’m still working with Covid-19 patients although the list of infected patients today is much lower, thank goodness. I’m happy to report that, knock on wood, I’ve tested NEGATIVE for the virus and for the antibodies, multiple times.
But this is not the time to become too lax about this. Just take a look at what’s happening in Florida, Texas, Arizona, and California. Be safe, be vigilant, wear a mask!
Today on part two of our Rewind ’99 series we take a look back at the camera that arguably started the luxury compact camera revolution, the venerable Contax T.
Again, this series is about cameras that I was using in 1999 and in 1999 the Contax T was in regular rotation for me. Indeed, one of my most used cameras ever!
Apologies for the delay on this article. It should’ve been finished a long time ago around Christmas of last year but it was then that I came down with a bad case of the cold. And at the same time, I got a new job!
How can I afford to review these cameras for you guys? As I said in one of my videos…You gotta work son! 🙂
The Contax T was introduced by Kyocera in 1984. It is a manual focus, compact 35mm rangefinder camera.
It was one of the first luxury point and shoot cameras to be marketed. What is meant by “luxury?” Basically it means that it was marketed as a premium camera with hight build quality and high optical quality. And of course, high price too! 🙂
AS A CAMERA
The Contax T as mentioned above is a manual focus, rangefinder camera that uses 35mm film. The camera features a 38mm f/2.8 Carl Zeiss T* lens. It has a shutter speed range of to 1/500 and an aperture range of f/2.8 to f/16. Minimum focus distance is 1 meter.
The camera is manual wind and manual rewind. It comes in either black or silver trim. The camera relies on two MS76 batteries to function.
For those of you who prefer a more “dynamic’ experience 😀
I don’t really enjoy making videos, but I do it for YOU! 🙂
HOW I CAME ACROSS THE CONTAX T
I bought the Contax T around 1996 or 1997. I can’t remember what got me interested in the camera but in those days it was most likely from either reading an article about it in a magazine or perhaps someone told me about it. During my free time, I hung out at camera stores quite often back then so that’s a very real possibility.
I do remember very clearly where I got it from. I got it from camera dealer Tamarkin. Now a lot of the general public may not know the store but I’m sure you old school hardcore camera lovers have heard of them.
It was Stan Tamarkin’s old store in Woodbridge, Connecticut. Today I believe they are out in Chicago. I believe they are now better known for holding auctions on rare, classic cameras. They are a good dealer, albeit on the pricey side a lot of times.
Anyway, I saw the Contax T listed in an ad in Shutterbug magazine, back when they had that cool oversized format.
In the mid 1990s the internet was still in primitive stages and most camera dealers did not yet have an online presence.
What the dealers did was to put their ads with listings of their inventory in the major photography magazines.
Whether or not the item was still in stock you could not really tell until you call them! It’s hard to imagine this today in a world where we can see right away whether an item is in stock or out of stock!
Some say “the good old days weren’t always good” and even though I’m a nostalgic fool, this time I agree with them! The online system of buying and selling is much better, but there is a charm to the old school way, almost like waiting for your film to come back and not knowing if you have any keepers 🙂
CONTAX T IMPRESSIONS
My first impression of the Contax T was one of awe at the feel and beauty of this compact gem.
There was indeed a feeling of “luxury” and that this camera was different from any other I had used previously. The metal was cool to the touch and it weighed more than it looked. Seeing “Carl Zeiss” on the lens thrilled me!
That first impression was in 1995 or 1996. And in 1999, I was still feeling the love for the Contax T. It was like my pride and joy in many ways 🙂
I suspect this is the way many people new to the brand feel upon holding their first Contax. It did give the impression that it was different from the typical Canon or Nikon camera. And in reality, it was and is different from many cameras, even today!
When in the closed position, the camera is small, neat, and compact. To turn it “on” you need to pull the clamshell down. Once you do, the 38mm f/2.8 Carl Zeiss Sonnar lens comes out, and the camera powers on. And you can tell by the lights in the viewfinder and on the film counter which is the small top lcd.
There are people who love the clamshell design, and people who hate it. I would have preferred if it did not have this design. I feel it just makes it look less, how would I say this, neat maybe?
Nonetheless once you use the Contax T for a while you eventually get used to it. Once you realize that the clamshell protects the lens and turns on the camera when it’s in the down position, you realize it’s actually an integral part of the camera so you learn to live with it.
HANDLING AND IN USE
The Contax T without the flash attachment is small and compact. In fact, it may be small and compact to a fault meaning that it’s very easy for this camera to slip out of your hand so a case or handstrap should be considered essential. It’s not unlike a Minox or Rollei 35 in this respect.
Since the camera is primarily Aperture Priority there is not much in the way of controls, other than changing the aperture values on the lens. Even for my relatively small hands, it feels a little fidgety but not bad. I imagine larger hands may be more uncomfortable with it.
The viewfinder is small but usable to me. Inside the viewfinder, you will see three shutter speed indications, 30-125-500, basically 1/30, 1/125, and 1/500 but the camera will choose the values from its full range (8 secs to 1/500) automatically, depending on the exposure needed for the shot.
The Contax T is capable of excellent, even superb results. The 38mm f/2.8 Carl Zeiss Sonnar lens is the same, or similar, to the lens on the T2. Some people might say they are different lenses because the T2 can focus closer at 0.7 meters vs the 1 meter MFD on the T but I think they just tweaked the lens on the T2 to focus closer. If there are any differences between the lenses, I’ve never seen it in the pictures.
Below are some samples from the Contax T over the years. It is probably best viewed on a computer and not on a phone. The images are not optimal as my scanner has broken and I’m using an iPhone to scan most of them. I’m not making excuses, it is what it is!
I give credit where credit is due and as I said before the Contax T has been my most reliable T series Contax. I bought it used in 1996 or 1997 and it still works! But it hasn’t been exactly flawless and there are a few issues to look out for.
First let me address the common issues which are just cosmetics, superficial, Watch for the rubber front grip to come loose and eventually fall off. That’s what happened to mine after prolonged use. It happened years ago, maybe more than ten years ago. I lost the part but it doesn’t really bother me so I never tried to replace it. But with the T being so diminutive and slippery, make sure you have a hand strap or case. It’s very easy to slip out of your hands!
The body scratches with use, especially if you carry it around in your pocket like I did or don’t keep it in a case. Again, it’s just cosmetics but if you like your cameras pristine, take some precautions.
The rangefinder spot on mine is now so dim, it’s getting harder and harder to focus with it. A trick you can do is to put a tiny dot of ink or a tiny black dot on the rangefinder window, superimposed over the place where the rangefinder patch would be. This helps increase contrast making it easier to focus the rangefinder.
I don’t know who came up with this, but I remember reading about it from a Tripod page from one of the early internet camera site pioneers, the great Rick Oleson. I give credit where credit is due! I hope you’re still out there and doing your thing Rick, I really enjoy your writings!
The more serious issues, like most Contax/Yashica cameras has to do with aging electronics. From my own experiences, these camera acts more unpredictably if the batteries are not fresh or have been sitting in the camera for a while. I’ve seen this in two T cameras.
The most serious issue is a shutter that begins to sound “weak” like its dying and changing batteries don’t really help. This is happening on my first T. Check my video for an account of what happened to my camera.
It doesn’t mean the camera will die soon but it might. If buying one make sure you buy from a place with a good warranty or return policy. Check our trusted affiliates.
PRICES AND AVAILABILITY
The Contax T is not a common camera but still easily found. If seeking one of these, prices are trending between $400-600. Compared to its sibling the T2, it’s a bargain that will offer you very similar pictures in a more compact (without the detachable flash) but manual focus package.
The Contax T was the first in a dynasty of T series cameras that has fascinated photographers and camera collectors for over thirty years.
Yashica, the manufacturer of the Contax T, were an amazingly innovative company that pushed boundaries and thought outside the box to give camera lovers very different, unique and high quality cameras with their Contax brand.
While the Zeiss Ikon Contax brand may have been the original Contax Camera Legend, they were unsuccessful at topping Leica for the camera king crown and one could argue that when Yashica took over the Contax name, they had a much more successful run.
When people think of Contax today, the Zeiss Ikon Contax is usually not the first thing they think of. Most people will think of Contax/Yashica and the Contax T with its diminutive size and super sharp optics led the way.
It could be argued that if the Contax T was not successful, there would not have been a T2, T3, TVS, etc, etc.
For many people the Contax T is the Camera Legend that introduced the high end, premium compact 35mm camera to the world. It made people marvel at what could be accomplished with a small, high quality camera design. It was equipped with a superb Carl Zeiss 38mm f/2.8 Sonnar lens that takes wonderful photos and does so in a small and pocketable form. After the Contax T, small compact cameras would never again be restricted to being “just a point and shoot.”
And yes this author can testify that the Contax T is the first camera he truly fell in love with!
I posted this photo to places like Pbase and Flickr in 2009 in tribute to Yohihasa Maitani, the brilliant Olympus camera designer and a true Camera Legend who passed away in that same year. Today, I post it for the “death” of Olympus cameras as we know it.
I’m sure by now that most of you have heard the news reported on June 24, 2020, that Olympus will sell off their camera division to a group called Japan Industrial Partners. The deal is expected to be finalized in September of this year.
Now it seems the common sense thought would be that Japan Industrial Partners will continue to make and sell cameras to continue the Olympus name. However, I’m not so hopeful about that.
Why? Because this is the same group that bought the rights to Sony VAIO. Now I don’t know where you live, but here in the States I haven’t seen a Sony VAIO computer in ages!
Olympus was one of my favorite brands in the early days and indeed to this day. They made great cameras and they knew how to make top notch optics. Thus this is very sad news for me! I will have more on Olympus in future postings. But for today, let’s have a moment of silence for the passing of a true Camera Legend, Olympus, indeed a giant in the world of cameras.
Good Sunday morning you guys! As I revealed earlier I’m also a healthcare worker. In fact, it’s how I make my living.
So today, before I talk about our camera of the day, let me tell you a little about I got into healthcare.
In my twenties, back in the 1990s, I graduated from college with a Bachelor’s in Communication Arts, majoring in Advertising. I took advertising after much personal struggle. I’ve always had an artistic heart but I also wanted to please my parents who wanted their son to work in the business world.
And being a loyal son to my old school parents yet wanting to have some part in the decision I took advertising because I felt it was a good compromise between art and business.
Anyway, working in advertising provided me with an opportunity to use my homebrew photography skills and I worked in this field for several years until a couple of layoffs made me realize that I needed a backup field where I would always have work. I met a person who pointed me in the direction of healthcare and the rest is history. In fact, my “backup” field became my main field of work! I’ll tell you guys more about this in future postings!
The Contax I is a 35mm rangefinder film camera introduced by Zeiss Ikon of Germany in 1932. It had a production run of four years until 1936.
As a true hardcore camera aficionado and Contax super-fan, the Contax I was always a camera on my wishlist. However, most of the cameras that I came across were either exorbitantly expensive or they were in unusable condition. Many times it was both.
In 2017, I negotiated a deal of $250 for the Contax I and Zeiss Sonnar 50mm f/2 collapsible. My particular camera is not without its problems as I’ll describe below but for $250 for the body and lens, and with a working shutter, I thought it was a deal!
My Contax I has shutter speeds of 1/25 to 1/1000th of a second plus B. Apparently there are variations that had slower shutter speeds but that was added later so mine must be an earlier model.
The best information I have seen on the Contax I comes from Stephen Gandy’s fabulous Camera Quest website. It has all the information you need on the Contax I. Since Stephen said it best, I need to shut up! Here’s the link:
For those of you who prefer a more animated experience 🙂
In this video I also talk about my experiences on the unemployment line. I understand and empathize with those of you going through hard times. Stay strong, you WILL make it!
WHAT TO LOOK FOR IN THE CONTAX I
If you are looking to add the Contax I to your collection, keep in mind that (in my opinion) the Contax I should be viewed as a collectible. In other words, don’t expect to find one to use as a regular shooting camera. It may or may not be in working condition but don’t expect it to be perfect unless it’s been restored.
View the Contax I as a collectible first and foremost. Why? Well, first of all the Contax I is really old at this point. Introduced in 1932, these cameras are close to 90 years old. Secondly, even in its day it didn’t have the best reputation for reliability. It was seen as a premium product that was rushed to market in order to compete with the Leica 1 or A as its known.
As a “premium” product, Zeiss tried to outdo Leica anyway they could. If the Leica had zone focus, the Contax would have a rangefinder. If Leica had a cloth shutter, the Contax would have a metal bladed shutter. If Leica topped out at 1/500, the Contax would top out at 1/1000.
Unfortunately, the Contax ultimately ended up as a well conceived product that didn’t quite deliver on the perception its specs conjured up. The shutter on the Contax I is said to be “fragile” or unreliable so that’s the first thing you should look for in these cameras. If the shutter blades are intact and working, that’s a big step in the right direction.
One funny side note…you guys might remember how I’ve often talked of Contax/Yashica and how I’ve always said they made great cameras that were not the most reliable? Well, it seemed Yashica was just following in the spirit of the Contax I! 🙂
Despite all the bad things I’ve read about the “fragile” shutter on the Contax I, the vertically traveling metal blades are still working on mine. I know of at least two other people shooting with the Contax I as well.
But accurate, it is probably not. The speeds feel off to me, which is to be expected for a camera this old. The rangefinder patch on mine is pretty much gone. I can barely make it out. Keep in mind the rangefinder and many other things will probably have worn out on a camera this old.
I know of a great trick where one puts a tiny black dot on the rangefinder window and it worked in the past with other cameras I had with dim rangefinders. I give credit where credit is due. I learned this trick from the website of a man named Rick Oleson, one of the early pioneers of internet photography pages.
His page is on the “tripod” platform that’s how far back it goes! My very first website in 1999 was also on Tripod. I made one page and back then it wasn’t easy like what I’m doing on WordPress today so anyway I put up one page, saw it once and never saw it again! I don’t even remember the name of my page, sad ain’t it?
Anyway, I just want to say Rick thanks for the useful tips and great articles you put on your site over the years. I hope you’re still out there doing your thing!
Ok so back to the Contax I. My rangefinder patch is so dim that even the black dot trick did little to remedy it. And it is true that not many people will attempt a repair on this camera. I reached out to a couple of renowned camera repair people and they politely declined to even attempt it.
So I have to just accept it. I use zone focus and try to compensate for shutter speeds that appear to be slower than the values.
Do you guys remember this article I wrote in early 2019?
Well, the mystery is solved! All those images (above) were taken with the Contax I and 50mm f/2 Sonnar collapsible. The film was Kodak Gold 400. How do I know? Well, these photos were taken in 2017. I found a memo I kept for the cameras I was using that summer of 2017 and especially because I was taking a road trip to south Jersey. The only film camera on the memo for that time frame was the Contax I. In fact, in the article I stated that I suspected it might be the Contax!
None of these images are what I would consider “winners” but considering that I was zone focusing and dealing with a less than optimal shutter, I guess I didn’t do too badly. I’m just happy anything came out! Honestly, I thought the whole roll would be unusable.
I can see the lens is suffering from flare and/or haze, maybe. Still, I do like its rendering on some the images. It’s got an old school vibe to it.
Now I’m even more inclined to put another roll in the Contax I just to verify the results.
PRICE & AVAILABILITY
As I mentioned, the Contax I should be seen as a collectible first and foremost. If you can actually use it for photography, all the better!
That said, prices are all over the place for this camera. As a collectible, there are many factors that will determine the final price. The factors include condition, mechanical and cosmetic, usable or non working, and whether it’s bundled with lenses, accessories, etc.
As a rough guide, I have seen the body alone go from $250-600, and even seen some unscrupulous overseas sellers charging up to $1000. Unless it’s really pristine, working, and has all original accessories I wouldn’t pay anywhere near $1000 for one…and I’m a hardcore Contax fan!
Again, I got mine, body and lens for $250 USD. For that price, it was not without its flaws as I said. Very dim (unusable) RF patch, shutter speeds off. But, it works! And that was the most important thing to me. The fact that I got it cheap was also a deciding factor 🙂
The Contax I is without a doubt a true legitimate Camera Legend. It is with the Contax I that the legend of Contax was born.
It was an ambitious attempt by Zeiss Ikon, one of the premier names in photography, to compete with Leica for supremacy and control of the then new 35mm film camera market.
Perhaps due to over ambitious and rushed execution, the Contax I is seen today as a somewhat failed product with a reputation for reliability problems. The later Contax II and III/IIIa are much better user cameras but there can only be one number one and the Contax I was the first.
I’ve talked many times about “the real Contax” and the Contax I represents this better than any other Contax I own. It is the camera that put the Contax name into the world, a name that still imprints the thought “Camera Legend” onto the hearts of camera lovers worldwide.
While the Contax II and III/IIIa and the Zeiss lenses cemented Contax as one of the world’s finest camera brands, the flawed Contax I was the first and as such it will always be the camera that started the Contax legend.
Good day everyone. Honestly, ever since this virus started ramping up here in the USA I haven’t been in any kind of camera review mood, although with most people at home it’s probably a good time for it.
We are living in unprecedented times, going into uncharted territory. I’m still having a hard time believing what is happening right now. It’s really like a nightmare come true. I never imagined living through anything like this!
I’m posting today to say that I wish you and your families, each and every one of you, to be safe during this COVID-19 coronavirus crisis.
Do your best to be safe. Be careful with what you touch. Wash your hands often. Be diligent. Practice social distancing.
In addition to photography, I also work in healthcare. I am considered an “essential” worker thus I need to go to work every day. It gives me great anxiety but at the same time I consider it my duty. I see the escalation in cases here in the USA. This thing ain’t no joke. TAKE IT SERIOUSLY!
I also put a very short video up about it due to the seriousness of this crisis. I know some people prefer to watch videos and especially the younger folks, 20-30 year olds, etc.
If you don’t have to go out, don’t. It’s not the worst thing in the world to stay home now is it? I wish I could but I can’t. But if you can, do it! Stay in. Ride the storm. Perfect time to get reacquainted with your cameras and lenses!
Work on your photography techniques. Read the photo forums. Talk to your friends on social media or FaceTime them. Technology is a big help during this crisis. Social distancing doesn’t mean you have to be alone.
If we all practice good safety habits, we should all get through this together. The cameras can wait. Your life is more important. Stay safe, stay blessed. See you soon! -Sam
I’m not a rambling man and I’m certainly don’t know what a “Rambler” is but I do know it’s cool old car!
This I believe is an AMC Rambler, and I know it’s a cool old car but other than that I don’t know much about it. If you do, please let me know!
I found this while walking to visit some friends in New York. You never know what you might find in NYC!
I used my trusty Leica M8 and the 7Artisans 35mm f/2 that I acquired only three months ago. The image was processed with NikEfex. More and more I’m lovin’ this lens! And you might have heard that the M8 is the next best digital camera to the Monochrom for b&w images? Well, I’ve never used the Monochrom but they call the M8 the “Poor Man’s Monochrom” and I’m inclined to believe it! Have a good, safe day folks!
Good morning everyone. Wow it seems the world as we knew it has changed profoundly since the last posting.
The fear and anxiety surrounding the current COVID-19 Coronavirus has gripped the world. In this current state it seems to me that doing another camera review would be trivial.
People are pretty much fearing for their lives at this point. Not only the possibility of getting sick but also the disruption to the normalcy of everyday life.
In countries hardest hit like China, where the outbreak began, people in specific regions such as the Wuhan epicenter have been under a mandatory lockdown. Italy, also hard hit with the coronavirus, has done the same. Now Spain and perhaps a few other countries.
In the USA and specifically here in New York, it’s just beginning to get bad. I’ll tell you something, in my five decades on the planet I’ve never experienced anything like this.
I thought 9/11 was the worst I’ve seen but this coronavirus pandemic may be even more scary because it’s possible to catch this virus anywhere.
We all know the theories about how this started. It’s thought that the virus was born in a Wuhan wet market where exotic animals were being slaughtered for customers willing to pay for superstitious beliefs not based in science.
If true, I say come on man! Leave those bats and pangolins alone! They were not meant to be eaten by human beings. For God’s sake stop this nonsense.
I also wonder if climate change has opened up an environment where germs and viruses could thrive.
Now don’t get me wrong, I’m not one to preach about the environment to you. I don’t know if human activities lead to climate change. For all we know, the Sun could have grown just minutely and even that could be enough to affect our climate.
What I do know is that here in NYC, this was the mildest winter I’ve ever experienced. I’m not a fan of the snow so I can’t really complain but I do find it very disturbing. When you think of the long term effects it’s downright scary.
I mean, back in the 80s and 90s when I was growing up, the winters were cold and sometimes brutal but there was a rhyme, reason, and predictability to the seasons that made it a beautiful thing.
Today, just like everything else it seems, the weather patterns here on Earth seem like a “play it by ear” thing. Now you never know from one day to another what the weather will be like.
To me it’s obvious the climate is changing and pretty rapidly. Friend, if you can’t see it and feel it, I think you’ve got your head in the sand.
Anyway I’ve never been one moved enough to write about it but after only one sprinkling of snow this winter I’m more inclined than ever to do my part to save the environment and to help our planet from this downward spiral.
Anyway, everybody please stay alert and be vigilant about minimizing your chances of catching this notorious COVID-19 Coronavirus. It’s so far the biggest worldwide crisis I’ve ever seen.
Technical Note: These two images were taken with the Leica M8 and 7Artisans 35mm f/2 lens which has been touted by some as a “Summicron” copy but for under $300. I’m not ready to make any conclusions but I will say the lens has been impressing me! More pics to come!
Someone said “Samster, you lil sumbitch, get a REAL job!” 😀 And that’s just what I did. I’m working a regular j-o-b now, all the overtime I can get, which helps put food on the table, feed the family, and maybe even buy a new toy with the leftovers, whatever is left and sometimes there’s nothing left. However, it doesn’t leave me with a lot of time to devote to my passion which are the cameras. And y’all know I love them cameras! 😎📸👍🏻
This one was a result of a few days worth of writing. I don’t know how you guys with full time jobs do it, but I admire you! I really do! It takes work and dedication to work full time and run a daily blog. I can’t seem to do it!
As promised, there will be more quirky cameras coming your way and one of the funkier ones I have is this one, the Chinon Infrafocus 35F-MA (that’s a mouthful!). Don’t you just love the names they come up with?! 😀📸👍🏻
I got this a couple of years ago and like a growing list of cameras in my collection, I’ve never shot it. So this is by no means a technical review. I’d like to shoot it, sure I would, but any day of the week I’m probably shooting with something that interests me more so it always gets put in the back burner.
I mean, I have shot with cameras like the Nikon L35AF and Canon AFM which can be seen as the Chinon’s contemporary competitors in the 1980s as well as a few others that I can’t remember off the top of my head.
They’re all quite similar. That is, they’re all plasticky, they all have good optics and somewhat antiquated autofocus systems. Everything I’ve read on the Chinon leads me to believe it will be more of the same so nothing against the camera but it doesn’t really excite me optically and functionally.
I mean if I read someone saying something like “Oh my God, this camera has a Zeiss like lens!” I’d put a roll in right now but the thing is NOBODY has said that about the Chinon and if they did I’d say they’re BS’in! 🙂
I mean camera fanatics are an educated bunch. If it realistically had anything close to a Zeiss like lens you can be sure the prices of this camera would be through the roof but it’s not.
The Chinon Infrafocus 35F-MA was an autofocus 35mm point and shoot camera introduced by Chinon Industries of Japan in the 1980s. I could not find the exact year, but I’m leaning towards 1984. If anyone knows for sure, please let me know and I’ll update this!
The lens is a 38mm f/2.8 “Chinonex Color Lens” (that’s what’s written on the lens!) and the camera autofocused using an early infrared system, which is what you see with the two big “bug eyes” as this camera is also sometimes called in nickname.
The camera is auto wind, auto rewind and runs on two AA batteries. Close focus is 2.9 feet.
The 35F-MA appears to be automatic exposure with no manual controls other than ASA selection.
POP ICON & TIDBITS
The camera, as mentioned, uses a fixed 38mm f/2.8 lens. As I mentioned in my Contax T2 review, “38mm f/2.8” was very popular on point and shoot cameras of the 1980s and 1990s. Don’t ask me why they chose this specific focal length and starting aperture but it always made me feel that a quality 35 to 40mm f/2.8 lens is NOT hard for any manufacturer to make and thus it shouldn’t be expensive.
Actually, it was probably a good compromise kind of lens. I mean, anything faster would have been very expensive. Anything wider would have been too wide for most people and anything larger than 40mm and faster than f/2.8 might have been challenging for the point and shoot autofocus technology of that timeframe, which was the early 1980s.
Well, the T2 with its Zeiss lens may be expensive, but the Chinon is most definitely not! Prices can be found below in the “Prices & Availability” section.
Another interesting thing about the Chinon Infrafocus 35F-MA is that it was apparently one of the cameras favored by the late great pop art icon, Andy Warhol.
When I got the camera, I didn’t know Andy had used one. I knew he used the Polaroid Big Shot and other cameras, but I didn’t know he used the Chinon until I saw an episode of “Autopsy: The Last Hours Of…” and I saw a photo with the Chinon hanging around his neck.
Right then and there I said to myself, wow, Mr. Warhol was not fluff and hype, he was the real deal! If there were any doubts, it was gone when I saw the Chinon around his neck because it says to me that the man was ahead of his time! He knew the camera looked cool and quirky and that its unique “bug eyes” were enough to make a fashion statement.
Never mind whether the camera sucked or not. It’s all about the looks, it’s pop art!! 🙂
The good thing is that while Andy Warhol was seen with the Chinon, it doesn’t seem to have increased its price or value in any way. Nothing like what Kendall Jenner or Chris Hemsworth did to the Contax T2.
This is perhaps because Andy Warhol was better known in the 1980s and perhaps not so much by today’s social media hipsters.
I’ve had this camera for a couple of years and I still haven’t shot it thus I’m not qualified to speak of its optical qualities.
However, from the few fine reviews I have read, the 38mm f/2.8 Chinonex lens is a good performer. Sharp but not Zeiss spectacular.
Quite in line with what I’d expect from it. Maybe that’s why I haven’t shot it. It doesn’t excite me in that way. The fact that it appears to be a fully automatic camera doesn’t help.
Still, perhaps it would surprise me. Perhaps I should pop a roll of film in it right now. Perhaps I shouldn’t put baby in a corner 😀
I’m a huge fan of odd, quirky cameras and of all the lesser known manufacturers, Chinon nears the top of my list of has-been camera makers. In my opinion, they were at the crest of making it into the big leagues but never did. Chinon as we knew it was bought out by Kodak in 1991 so we’ll never know what could have been.
But the name Chinon remains in my head as always a bit of a mystery so while the Infrafocus 35F-MA may never be a Camera Legend, the Chinon name I would argue could well be.
The Chinon Infrafocus 35F-MA is not a rare or much sought after camera which makes it cheap on the used market.
If seeking one of these cool, quirky cameras prices are trending from $15-40 USD.
The Chinon meets almost all of my criteria as a camera collector. It looks cool, it has some interesting history and it’s cheap. For me, cheap cameras are the best!
A shot using the old iPhone 6s Plus and some focus effects. What can’t you do with the phone cameras nowadays? 😍
As some of you may have seen in the news, the Taal Volcano in the Philippines erupted on January 12, 2020, the first time it had done so since 1977.
Usually when I hear news of amazing natural events such as hurricanes or volcanoes, I’m fortunate enough to be nowhere nearby. It’s usually in some far off land that I’ve never been to. You probably know that feeling!
But the Taal Volcano is different because while it is far away from where I live, I have seen the volcano in person many times over the years during my trips to Southeast Asia. Even though I’m not Filipino I love the Philippines!
Seeing a natural wonder such as a volcano whether it’s erupting or not is amazing. And its proximity, being just about an hour or so away from the capital of Manila, made the Taal Volcano a popular destination for quick getaways for many urban Filipino families.
In fact, a whole slew of businesses have been built around this volcano. Businesses such as hotels, restaurants, sightseeing and even amusement parks are built on the scenic views of the volcano in this region. Even wedding photographers are known to use this area and the Taal Volcano to enhance their images. It’s a natural wonder and a great photographic subject!
From my own experience, the four or five times I’ve been there, it’s hard to get a good detailed shot because there is perpetual haze, probably due to the high elevation and the fluctuating temperatures caused by simmering volcanic activity underneath the Taal Lake in which the bulk of the volcano resides.
But in 2011 I caught my best and clearest shot ever of the volcano! Now keep in mind I’ve always been told that the front “cone” you see is not the volcano itself. The actual volcano resides behind it.
The part that looks like the volcano is just a part of the whole volcanic system but it is the view most people actually see and photograph when they go to see the Taal volcano. To get to the heart of the volcano I understand you have to arrange a boat trip.
For this shot I used a Canon EOS 5D MKII, my main digital camera at the time. The lens used was the EF 135mm f/2L.
The damage to the nearby areas and loss of life have been reported to be low but it’s still a bit early to assess and scientists think there’s a chance a second eruption could come soon.
My sympathies and prayers to those who have suffered losses during this natural even which could have been a disaster had it caused more damage than it did. Stay safe, praying that the Taal does not blow its top again!
FLASHBACK LENS SPOTLIGHT
Industar 61 L/D
Here’s our lens spotlight for today and it’s the Industar 61 or otherwise known as the Industar 61 L/D. It supposedly has lanthanum, a rare-earth element in the coatings. Some people say it’s radioactive some say it’s not. All I can say is it’s a wonderfully affordable lens with character! 😎📸
The Industar 61 comes all the way from Ukraine and is said to be a Tessar formula. While mine is the 55mm version, I’ve also seen 52mm & 53mm versions of the same lens!
I’m not usually a fan f/2.8 prime lenses only because usually you get a choice of faster f/1.4-f/2 in the 50mm range of lenses but I can vouch for the nice sharpness and lovely and characteristic bokeh out of this lens if you get a good copy.
Best of all it’s $20-30 if you don’t mind waiting a month or more for it to arrive from our friends in the Ukraine! Why spend more on a Leica Elmer? 😀